As far as business jargon goes, “critical event management” is actually a pretty decent definition. It is fairly self-explanatory, and over the past few years, professionals in the fields of safety, risk management, and business continuity have come to recognize and use it fairly consistently.
With that said, I feel like there is quite a bit of room for improvement in not only understanding the basics, but in how the discipline has changed and what it requires today.
Critical event management (or CEM) is your company’s approach to handling major disruptions (aka critical events) before, during, and after they occur. In other words, critical event management is not just about responding when things go wrong—it's about having the right information, processes, and tools to identify potential threats early, notify the right people quickly, manage your response effectively, and then recover efficiently.
[INSERT LINEAR IMAGE)
This is not a particularly novel nor unusual definition, and, as I mentioned earlier, it is fairly intuitive. What’s more, most businesses have been approaching CEM in a pretty standard linear fashion as described above.
Why, then, should you care?
In the last few years, the business world’s approach to disruptions has changed rapidly:
For all these reasons, disruptions have to be calculated much, much more rapidly, and companies need to respond with increased vigilance and savvy. But, let’s not get ahead of ourselves—let’s start with the basics.
Traditionally, CEM consists of four main components:
Monitoring: Continuously scanning for potential threats or disruptions. This means tracking everything from weather patterns to social media trends to security alerts.
Alerting: Quickly notifying the right people — typically employees, but also potentially contractors, customers, and the public — when a threat is identified.
Response: Coordinating your organization's actions during the event. This includes activating response teams, implementing emergency procedures,
Recovery: Getting back to normal operations as efficiently as possible. This includes assessing damage, reallocating resources, and basically returning to the pre-event state as soon as possible.
Now, in my mind, the most critical differentiator in modern critical event management is how it is approached, both from a theoretical and practical standpoint. While all these components are in their own right, well, critical, it is unfortunate that most organizations see them as isolated steps in a process that that is primarily focused on the response. And while there has recently been focus on early detection and prevention, rarely do organizations think about critical event management differently.
Rather than a linear process, modern organizations think of critical event management as a virtuous cycle in which every event generates knowledge and information, and knowledge and information lead to better prediction, management, and recovery.
It may seem blasphemous to even mention “a virtuous cycle”, knowing the tremendous negative impact on people safety, and tremendous material, financial, and reputational damage on businesses. And yet, Manufacturing: Supply chain and production continuity
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
As a public benefit corporation, our heartbeat is people’s safety. At Kepler51, we
work with you to create a safer world for your employees and the public.